Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 Wis. 2d 563 - State v. Kwitek

53 Wis. 2d 563 - State v. Kwitek’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Ewell · Smith v. Hooey · Pollard v. United States · Dickey v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘. . . “The right of a speedy trial is necessarily relative. It is consistent with delays and depends upon circumstances. It secures rights to a defendant. It does not preclude the rights of public justice.” Beavers v. Haubert, 198 U. S. 77, 87 . “Whether delay in completing a prosecution ... amounts to an unconstitutional deprivation of rights depends upon the circumstances. . . . The delay must not be purposeful or oppressive.” Pollard v. United States, 352 U. S. 354, 361 . “[T]he essential ingredient is orderly expedition and not mere speed.” Smith v. United States, 360 U. S. 1, 10 .’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““While the legislature may, with propriety, adopt a numerical standard in calculating as a matter of public policy that charges should be dismissed after demand for trial and delay, we do not believe a court can fix such an arbitrary standard and base it upon judicial reasons.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.