Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 SO2D 849 - Fossett v. Davis

Fossett v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 495 So. 2d 1381 - Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co. · O'Dell v. State · Roberson v. Ammons · 495 So. 2d 23 - Lowder Realty, Inc. v. Odom · 475 So. 2d 1185 - Handley v. City of Birmingham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"1) the existence of a contract or business relation; 2) defendant's knowledge of the contract or business relation; 3) intentional interference by the defendant with the contract or business relation; and 4) damage to the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's interference."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.