Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

534 Pa. 255

Commonwealth v. Hatfield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 1993

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1993-08-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2002

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-08-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 1993, Appellant’s Application for Reargument is granted.

NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, J., dissent.LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., did not participate in the decision of this matter.

¶3*256ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶4This court having been advised that Appellee, Steven Hatfield, is deceased, the Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is GRANTED and the Application to Proceed with Reargument pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 502(a) and Petition to Vacate Orders Below are DENIED.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
/534/pa/255 · .json · Public domain