Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 539 F.3d 526 - Tucker v. Tennessee

Tucker v. Tennessee’s Empirical Analysis

539 F.3d 526 · 2008

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Whitfield v. Tennessee (2011), Sheehan v. City & County of San Francisco (2014)

7 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

710200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Street v. Jc Bradford & Company · Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a court] is not reguired to meet [a disabled person's] exact reguests. What is reguired by the ADA-and what the state court provided in this case-is an alternative which allows disabled persons to communicate as effectively as a non-disabled person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he district court has no 'duty to search the entire record to establish that it is bereft of a genuine issue of material fact.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “show that the discrimination was intentionally directed toward him or her in particular.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.