¶1The judgment in this case is affirmed, Tor the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Depue, Reed, Scudider, Van Syokel, Bqgert, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 10.
¶3For reversal — None.
54 N.J.L. 390
Decided March 15, 1892
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1892-03-15
<p>On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme ■Court, see 24 Vroom 498.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1892-03-15
Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024
2 federal appellate · 5 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.