Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

546 Pa. 430

685 A.2d 993

Commonwealth v. Everett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1996

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1996-11-14

Relies on Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Zehner · Commonwealth v. Matos

Decided 1996-11-14

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The decision of the Superior Court is REVERSED and the ORDER of the trial court entered on April 4, 1994 suppressing physical evidence is REINSTATED. See Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449, 672 A2d 769 (1996). Jurisdiction is relinquished.

CASTILLE, J., is filing a dissenting statement.
CASTILLE, Justice,

¶3dissenting.

¶4I respectfully dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449, 672 A.2d 769 (1996).

/546/pa/430 · .json · Public domain