Sandefur v. Cherry’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396D (§ 1905 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Singleton v. Wulff · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Hagans v. Lavine · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(as used in subsection (a)(5) of this section) shall include services of the type which an optometrist is legally authorized to perform where the State plan specifically provides that the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sandefur v. Cherry“for the measurement of the powers and testing the range of vision of the human eye,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sandefur v. Cherry“cataract glasses or contact lenses following cataract surgery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sandefur v. Cherry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.