¶1The trial court’s order revoking Appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, the case is remanded for the trial court to strike those findings that probation conditions 9 and 10 were violated. See § 948.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1987); Chatman v. State, 365 So.2d 789 (Fla.4th DCA 1978); Glaze v. State, 547 So.2d 313 (Fla.4th DCA 1989).
549 So. 2d 1168
549 So.2d 1168
14 Fla.L.Weekly 2376
Cusmina v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 11, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-10-11
Relies on Chatman v. State · 547 So. 2d 313 - Glaze v. State
Decided 1989-10-11