Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 549 So. 2d 250 - Ruffin v. State

549 So. 2d 250 - Ruffin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2019

17 state decisions

1301989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 520 So. 2d 582 - King v. State · Roberson v. State · Gonzalez v. State · 302 So. 2d 751 - McGough v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This was an invasion of the province of the jury. When factual determinations are within the realm of an ordinary juror’s knowledge and experience, such determinations and the conclusions to be drawn therefrom must be made by the jury. [The three officers] were not eyewitnesses to the crime, they did not have any special familiarity with Ruffin, and they were not qualified as any type of experts in identification.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When factual determinations are within the realm of an ordinary juror’s knowl edge and experience, such determinations and the conclusions to be drawn therefrom must be made by the jury. [The three officers] were not eyewitnesses to the crime, they did not have any special familiarity with Ruffin, and they were not qualified as any type of experts in identification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The opinion of a witness as to the identity of a person seen by him is admissible in all cases where the witness has a previous personal acquaintance with or knowledge of such person, and bases his opinion upon such acquaintance or knowledge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.