Arnold v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 1994
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sanders v. United States · Armstrong v. State · 33 Ala. App. 431 - McCain v. Sheppard · 42 Ala. App. 34 - Shuttlesworth v. State · 42 Ala. App. 551 - Gurley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[P]etitioner is not forever precluded from showing a violation of any constitutional rights that he has not knowingly and intelligently waived, or has become estopped to assert, if he can do so, by the filing of another petition for habeas corpus and presentation of evidence that should lead to a definite resolution of questions that are left in the air by the record now before us. We have held that a denial of habeas corpus is not res judicata. Shuttlesworth v. State , 42 Ala. App. 34 , 151 So.2d 734 , cert. denied, 275 Ala. 698 , 151 So.2d 738 (1962); Gurley v. State , 42 Ala. App. 551 , 171 So.2d 461 (1965). The principle of res judicata is inapplicable in habeas corpus petitions. This does not collide with the principle that successive petitions for the same relief on grounds theretofore presented and fully considered and determined need not be entertained. Sanders v. United States , 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Ex parte Nations , 42 Ala. App. 128 , 154 So.2d 762 (1963)."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.