Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 550 SW2D 78 - Rogers v. State

Rogers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2008 · most notably McManus v. State (1979), Brem v. State (1978)

25 state decisions

1301977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Plant Food Corporation v. State · Clark v. State · Moore v. State · 77 Tex. Crim. 221 - Gray v. State · Sandlin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘did then and there unlawfully knowingly and intentionally, by threatening the imminent infliction of death to Charles Douglas Hedrick, compel Charles Douglas Hedrick, a person not the spouse of Henry Albert Bradshaw, to engage in deviate sexual intercourse with Henry Albert Bradshaw without the consent of Charles Douglas Hedrick, by contact between the genitals of Henry Albert Bradshaw and the anus of Charles Douglas Hedrick with intent to arouse sexual desire of Henry Albert Bradshaw ... ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A person commits an offense if, with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person, he engages in devi ate sexual intercourse with a child, not his spouse, whether the child is of the same or opposite sex, and the child is younger than 17 years.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(2) acting with intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense, he solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other person to commit the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.