Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-11-01

Relies on 545 So. 2d 279 - State v. Burch · 545 So. 2d 908 - Blankenship v. State · 546 So. 2d 1192 - Yanke v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-11-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2006

4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. See Bennett v. State, 546 So.2d 1192 (Fla.2d DCA 1989) (Campbell, C.J., specially concurring); Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908 (Fla.2d DCA 1989) (Hall, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part); State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla.4th DCA 1989).

¶2As in Bennettand Blankenship, we determine the issue of whether chapter 87-243, Laws of Florida, violates Article III, Section 6 of the Florida Constitution to be of great public importance and certify the following question to the supreme court:

DOES SECTION 893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1987) VIOLATE THE ONE SUBJECT REQUIREMENT OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 6 OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

CAMPBELL, C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.