Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 552 So. 2d 906 - Walker v. State

552 So. 2d 906 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Armstrong v. State · Milam v. State · 415 So. 2d 1190 - Eldridge v. State · United States v. Spivey · 485 So. 2d 379 - Powell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial judge only had to find that [the appellant] Walker violated his probation to his ‘reasonable satisfaction.’ Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100 , 312 So.2d 620, 623 (1975), and the standard of proof is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt or a preponderance of the evidence. Powell v. State, 485 So.2d 379 (Ala.1986). The State was not required to ‘convict’ [the appellant] Walker of the crime ... at the probation revocation hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The [probationer's] unexplained possession of recently stolen property creates a rebuttable presumption that the [probationer] had knowledge that the property was stolen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.