552 So. 2d 929 - Hamilton v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State · Bender v. Bender · 520 So. 2d 87 - Waldman v. Waldman · 491 So. 2d 614 - Howerton v. Howerton · 478 So. 2d 106 - Featherngill v. Featherngill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]utomatic increases in alimony based solely on income increases of the paying party are generally improper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stewart v. Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.