United States v. Dyba’s Empirical Analysis
554 F.2d 417 · 1977
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2008 · most notably Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. (1990), Mason v. Texaco, Inc. (1991)
34 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Allen v. United States · Davis v. Alaska · Barrett v. United States · Smith v. Crouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“colloquy between the judge and the jury foreman, [the] circumstances surrounding the giving of the instruction, and consideration of the American Bar Association Standards on Criminal Justice Relating to Trial by Jury”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[7] You are not partisans. You are judges; judges of the facts. Your sole interest here is to seek the truth from the evidence in the case. Remember at all times that no juror is expected to yield a conscientious conviction he or she may have as to the weight or effect of the evidence; but remember also that after full deliberation and consideration of the evidence in the case, it is your duty to agree upon a verdict if you can do so without surrendering your conscientious conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Harry“); United States v. Butler, 904 F.2d 1482, 1487 (10th Cir.1990) (same); Hernandez-Garcia, 901 F.2d at 879 (same); see also United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420-21 (10th Cir.1977) (emphasizing the "probability that there would not be better evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Harry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.