554 So. 2d 313 - Trotter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
77 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2018 · most notably 604 So. 2d 280 - Fleming v. State (1992), 637 So. 2d 871 - Perry v. State (1994)
77 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Pollard v. United States · Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Cole v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny person convicted of an offense in a circuit court may appeal to the supreme court, provided, however, an appeal from the circuit court to the supreme court shall not be allowed in any case where the defendant enters a plea of guilty.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lett v. State · Booker v. State“Inordinate delay, wholly aside from possible prejudice to a defense on the merits, may `seriously interfere with the defendant's liberty, whether he is free on bail or not, and ... may disrupt his employment, drain his financial resources, curtail his associations, subject him to public obloquy, and create anxiety, in him, his family and his friends.' United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 320 [, 92 S.Ct. 455, 463 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 ] (1971). These factors are more serious for some than for others, but they are inevitably present in every case to some extent .. .”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bingham v. State · Summers v. State“[i]n Burns v. State, 344 So.2d 1189 (Miss.1977), this Court implied that an appeal from a sentence imposed pursuant to a guilty plea is not equivalent to an appeal from the guilty plea itself. In Burns , an appeal from denial of a habeas corpus petition challenging the legality of a sentence imposed subsequent to a guilty plea was treated by this Court as a direct appeal. While the Court acknowledged the language of § 99-35-101, the Court stated: "We do not deem the present case as an appeal from a guilty plea." Burns, 344 So.2d at 1190 .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.