Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 F.2d 881 - Ray v. Mabry

Ray v. Mabry’s Empirical Analysis

556 F.2d 881 · 1977

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
August 2023
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Howard v. King (1983), Martin v. Sargent (1985)

23 federal appellate · 2 district ·

220197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Shannon · Jackson v. Bishop · Holt v. Sarver · Holt v. Sarver · Finney v. Hutto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[F]or prison officials knowingly to compel convicts to perform physical labor which is beyond their strength, or which constitutes a danger to their lives or health, or which is unduly painful constitutes an infliction of cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment....'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “excessive hours [90 to 120 hours per week], from working on Sundays, and from being compelled to perform duties beyond his physical capabilities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Id. (quoting Talley v. Stephens, 247 F.Supp. 683, 687 (E.D.Ark.1965) ). Further,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.