Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 SO2D 459 - Pertz v. Zohar

Pertz v. Zohar’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 377 So. 2d 1150 - Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee · 405 So. 2d 1345 - BC Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado · State v. Camper · 504 So. 2d 418 - Carter v. Carter · 552 So. 2d 292 - Southeast Bank v. Steves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or of the evidentiary rulings and where a statement of the record has not been prepared, a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.