Addis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rivera v. United States · 311 So. 2d 104 - State v. Ecker · 471 So. 2d 147 - DA v. State · 516 So. 2d 95 - Cabrera v. Wright · 529 So. 2d 1160 - Chamson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Something more than the above is needed before such an arrest can be considered legally justified. Additional facts and circumstances would be needed to tip the balance in favor of upholding the arrest and resulting search. Here, for example, no door handles were tried and no cars were repeatedly circled by the appellant. Therefore, with the arrest being unlawful, it was error for the trial court to deny the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence gathered therefrom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. R.R. v. State“`the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant' a finding that a breach of the peace is imminent or the public safety is threatened.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.