558 So. 2d 34 - Campbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · American States Insurance v. Piasecki · 492 So. 2d 1329 - Florida Bar v. Wolf · Steinhorst v. State · Davis v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Temporary control of contraband in the presence of an actual owner for the purpose of verifying that it is what it purports to be or to conduct the test for [quality] prior to completion of transaction without more does not constitute legal possession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. State“with the trial court that there are additional facts [the $3,000 upfront payment, and Campbell's statement that he would take the kilo sampled] existing in this case which remove it from the [ Garces ] rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. State“a defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on the rules of law applicable to his theory of defense if there is any evidence to support such instruction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Campbell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.