Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

562 So. 2d 1310

Clay v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1990-03-30

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2006

3 state decisions

Relies on Washington v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-03-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON REMAND PROM SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

TYSON, Judge.

¶2The Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex Parte Clay, 562 So.2d 1307 (Ala.1990) has directed this court to remand this cause for a factual hearing to determine the issue of whether the defense counsel and the prosecutor had reached a plea agreement and, if so, a determination of the terms of the agreement. In accordance with Clay, supra, the circuit court is instructed to prepare written findings of fact on this matter and to further proceed as directed in Clay, supra.

¶3REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.
/562/so2d/1310 · .json · Public domain