Siekierda v. Commonwealth

Decided December 22, 2000

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2004

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-12-22

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, the order of the common pleas court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCafferty, 568 Pa. 46, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000), and *522Harrington v. Commonwealth, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).

Justice CAPPY files a concurring statement.CAPPY, Justice,

¶3concurring.

¶4I join the per curiam reversal and remand for the reasons set forth more fully in my concurring opinion in Harrington v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386. (2000).