Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 F.2d 217 - United States v. Hooper

United States v. Hooper’s Empirical Analysis

564 F.2d 217 · 1977

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
February 1989
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1701 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651

Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Baldwin v. New York · Hampton v. United States · Geduldig v. Aiello · Frank v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Paragraph # 1] Upon entering a judgment of conviction of any offense not punishable by death or life imprisonment, any court having jurisdiction to try offenses against the United States when satisfied that the ends of justice and the best interest of the public as well as the defendant will be served thereby, may suspend the imposition or execution of sentence and place the defendant on probation for such period and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems best. [Paragraph #7] The court may require a person as conditions of probation to reside in or participate in the program of a residential community treatment center, or both, for all or part of the period of probation_”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.