Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

564 Pa. 137

764 A.2d 1052

Durham v. McElynn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 2000

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2000-12-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2005

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-12-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2000, the Motion for leave to file reply brief to respondent’s brief pursuant to Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 2113(d) is denied without prejudice to peti-

/564/pa/137 · .json · Public domain