Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 Pa. 205 - In Re Iulo

In Re Iulo’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kiesewetter (2005), In re Greenberg (2001)

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

290200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Wilson · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller · Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. Williams · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Surrick · Stilp v. Hafer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) identity in the thing sued upon; (2) identity in the cause of action; (3) identity of person and parties to the action; and (4) identity of the capacity of the parties suing or being sued.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[DJeterrence is a considerable factor in matters of reciprocal discipline. Pennsylvania will not tolerate a reputation for welcoming disbarred attorneys from other jurisdictions to practice law with impunity in our courtrooms. Although we have always favored a system of professional discipline that weighs each individual case on its merits, we acknowledge that sometimes a brightline rule must be drawn. The need to deter other similarly situated attorneys from swarming to our courts is cause to create such a brightline rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.