¶1ORDER
¶2AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2001, for the reasons set forth in In the Matter of Iulo, 766 A.2d 335 (Pa.2001), No. 560 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, the Rule to Show Cause is DISCHARGED.
768 A.2d 845
Decided March 22, 2001
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2001-03-22
Relies on In Re Iulo
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-03-22
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably Commonwealth v. Markman (2007), Commonwealth v. Rivera (2001)
4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ORDER
¶2AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2001, for the reasons set forth in In the Matter of Iulo, 766 A.2d 335 (Pa.2001), No. 560 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, the Rule to Show Cause is DISCHARGED.