564 Pa. 604
770 A.2d 287
Decided March 22, 2001
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2001-03-22
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Winklespecht v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole (2002), Commonwealth v. Lee (2007)
4 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
Relies on Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-03-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Dissenting.
¶2Since I believe that a person seeking parole is entitled to limited appellate review of a Board order denying parole, as explained in my dissenting opinion in Rogers v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole, 555 Pa. 285, 724 A.2d 319 (1999), I must respectfully dissent.