Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 566 NE2D 1027 - Best v. State

Best v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably Bivins v. State (1995), Bieghler v. State (1997)

38 state decisions

340199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Solem v. Helm · Alfaro v. State · Clark v. State · Ramos v. State · Stwalley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The standard for counsel's performance is that of reasonably effective assistance. To prevail on his claim, [appellant] must show that his attorney's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing norms. He also must prove that his attorney's failure to function was so prejudicial as to deprive him of a fair trial. A fair trial is denied when the conviction or sentence results from a breakdown that renders the result unreliable. Siglar v. State (1989), Ind., 541 N.E.2d 944 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “one of the prior crimes relied upon for sentencing was a 1986 [sic] second degree burglary, the equivalent of a class C felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is not particularly aggravated ... [and] [tlhe incident caused little damage to property or person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.