Volume 567 — Pacific Reporter, Third Series

Whether the trial court erred in interpreting A.R.S. § 25-409(C)(2) as requiring a child to have had two legal parents when a third-party petitions for visitation.

¶0 This appeal concerns whether an Oklahoma district court has jurisdiction over a juvenile deprived proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), 43 O.S.2024, §§ 551-101 to 551-402.

¶0 Charter Oak Production Co., LLC paid to settle a property damage claim brought by landowners after a pipeline installed on its easement ruptured. Charter Oak then sought indemnity from JM Eagle, Inc., and Rainmaker Sales, Inc., who supplied the pipe Charter Oak alleges was defective. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of JM Eagle and Rainmaker, finding that Charter Oak lacked the legal relationship required to assert an indemnity claim and that the claim was barred by the economic loss rule. The Court of Civil Appeals, Division IV, reversed. We granted certiorari to address whether a party may seek indemnity without an independent legal relationship and whether the economic loss rule bars indemnity for damage to third-party property.

¶ 1 Pursuant to Rule 8 (Resignation Pending Disciplinary Proceedings), Oklahoma Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 O.S.2011, ch. 1, app. 1-A, Respondent submitted an affidavit, filed December 10, 2024, seeking to resign her membership in the Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA) and relinquish her right to practice law pending disciplinary proceedings. On the same date, Complainant filed an application to this Court for an order approving the resignation of Respondent. Upon consideration of the matter, we find: