Holmes-Martin v. Leavitt’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
24 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 7701
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Conley v. Gibson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment,” the substance of the motion is devoted to the defendant’s arguments for summary judgment rather than dismissal. Indeed, the plaintiff titles her response an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the [Jane Doe 1's] employment and create[d] an abusive working environment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“summary judgment would normally be appropriate,” “[b]ecause the plaintiff offers no corroboration for her affidavit”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.