Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

570 Pa. 488

810 A.2d 634

Commonwealth v. Davis

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Wayne DAVIS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 2002.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2002-11-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2004

2 state decisions

Relies on Commonwealth v. Eller

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-11-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

ORDER

¶2PER CURIAM.

¶3AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2002, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and we REVERSE the Order of the Superior Court. See Commonwealth v. Eller,807 A.2d 838 (Pa. 2002).

¶4Justice NIGRO files a dissenting statement.

¶5Justice NIGRO, dissenting.

¶6I respectfully dissent from the Court's per curiam order reversing the instant matter for the reasons set forth in my concurring and dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Eller,807 A.2d 838 (Pa. 2002).

/570/pa/488 · .json · Public domain