Singh v. Napolitano’s Empirical Analysis
577 F.3d 988 · 2009
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
February 2015
most recently cited
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on 25 I. & N. Dec. 1 - COMPEAN
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for the limited purpose of ruling upon whether the Board had jurisdiction to hear Singh’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims and what effect, if any, the Attorney General’s recent opinion in In re Compe-an, 25 I & N Dec. 1 , 3 (BIA 2009), has on this case. The Board shall advise this court of any action or decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.