Singh v. Napolitano

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Aug. 11, 2009.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2009-08-11

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2015

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for the limited purpose of ruling upon whether the Board had jurisdiction to hear Singh’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims and what effect, if any, the Attorney General’s recent opinion in In re Compe-an, 25 I & N Dec. 1 , 3 (BIA 2009), has on this case. The Board shall advise this court of any action or decision.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including Singh v. Napolitano, Singh v. Napolitano

Relies on 25 I. & N. Dec. 1 - COMPEAN

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-08-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Todd Bennett, El Cerrito, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

¶2Edward Alan Olsen, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

¶3Before J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, JEROME FARRIS and M. MARGARET McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for the limited purpose of ruling upon whether the Board had jurisdiction to hear Singh’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims and what effect, if any, the Attorney General’s recent opinion in In re Compean, 25 I & N Dec. 1, 3 *989(A.G.2009), has on this case. The Board shall advise this court of any action or decision.