58 Cal. App. 786
Decided July 11, 1922
California Court of Appeal · decided 1922-07-11
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to require the levy and collection of a tax sufficient to pay a judgment against a municipality. Writ granted. The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in Oscar Reyman <6 Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499.
Decided 1922-07-11
¶1
¶2A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922,
¶3All the Justices present concurred.
¶4Richards, J., pro tem., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.