Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

58 Cal. App. 787

Chilton v. Rolph

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1922

California Court of Appeal · decided 1922-07-11

PBOCEEDING in Mandamus to require the levy and collection of a tax sufficient to pay a judgment against a municipality. Writ granted. The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Eckwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499.

Decided 1922-07-11

THE COURT.

¶1[1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].

¶2A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of - appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.

¶3All the Justices present concurred.

¶4Bichards, J., pro tern., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.

/58/calapp/787 · .json · Public domain