Luchsinger v. Rolph

Decided July 11, 1922

California Court of Appeal · decided 1922-07-11

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to require the levy and collection of a tax. sufficient to pay a judgment against a municipality. Writ granted. The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in Oscar Hey man & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499.

Decided 1922-07-11

THE COURT.

¶1[1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].

¶2A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.

¶3All the Justices present concurred.

¶4Richards, J., pro tern., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.