Mills v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 311 So. 2d 104 - State v. Ecker · 41 So. 3d 188 - Caldwell v. State · JSB v. State · 516 So. 2d 95 - Cabrera v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because of its potential for abuse, the loitering and prowling statute must be applied with special care. It cannot be emphasized enough that the loitering and prowling statute is not to be used as a “catchall” provision whereby police may arrest citizens where there is no other basis which would justify their detention. Instead, the proper application of this statute requires a delicate balancing between the protection of the rights of individuals and the protection of individual citizens from imminent criminal danger to their persons or property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.