Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

581 Pa. 622

867 A.2d 1261

Commonwealth v. Conklin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 2005

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2005-01-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2006

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-01-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth, as part of its burden of proof in a proceeding to determine whether an individual is a sexually violent predator, must present expert testimony, in the form of a clinical diagnosis by a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist, that the individual suffers from a personality disorder or mental abnormality that makes the person likely to engage in predatory sexually violent offenses.
/581/pa/622 · .json · Public domain