Miller v. Nichols’s Empirical Analysis
586 F.3d 53 · 2009
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 13 district · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Alexander v. Sandoval · Southeastern Community College v. Davis · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Epstein · Grubb v. Public Utilities Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]nly the Supreme Court of the United States may invalidate state court civil judgments,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Efreom v. McKee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.