Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 588 F.2d 1327 - United States ex rel. Petrofsky v. Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall, McCarthy

United States ex rel. Petrofsky v. Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall, McCarthy’s Empirical Analysis

588 F.2d 1327 · 1978

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2020
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2020

12 federal appellate ·

80197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Crouse · Bertman v. J a Kirsch Co · Hearne v. E Smylie · United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States for the Benefit of Kenyon · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “other circumstances which indicate a need for more than the usual 30 days to make the appeal,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.