Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 59 CAL2D 646 - In re Koehne

In re Koehne’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably 3 Cal. 3d 205 - In Re Cox (1970), 70 Cal. 2d 851 - Galvan v. Superior Court (1969)

42 state decisions

220196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Lane · In Re Newbern · 58 Cal. 2d 117 - In Re Moss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether a particular statute or group of statutes is sufficiently comprehensive to show an intent to occupy the entire field is a matter which cannot properly be decided upon the basis of any single, precise test. Rather, the courts must rely upon broad general principles which are flexible enough to embrace our varied and rapidly expanding body of legislation. Determination of the question depends primarily upon an analysis of the statute and a consideration of the facts and circumstances upon which it was intended to operate, and the intent of the Legislature is not to be measured alone by the language used but by the whole purpose and scope of the legislative scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the regulation of the criminal aspects of being intoxicated”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.