59 N.J. 240
281 A.2d 377
ROBERT STUPIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRIMITIVO SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, RESPONDENT.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1971-09-27
Relies on 113 N.J. Super. 84 - Stupin v. Sanchez
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1971-09-27
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2012
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Mr. Stephen Mongiello argued the cause for appellant.
¶2Mr. Martin L. Sisselman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. James & Addas, attorneys).
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Halpern (113 N.J. Super. 84).
¶5For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN 6.
¶6For reversal None.