590 So. 2d 25 - Stayer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 564 So. 2d 618 - Dunlop v. Dunlop · Wimbley v. State · 496 So. 2d 919 - McCray v. State · 453 So. 2d 428 - Brannen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“paragraph, the jury was instructed: The Court further instructs you that the attempt to stop Mr. Starks constitutes a lawful execution of a legal duty. This instruction likewise is incorrect. The instruction should have stated, in generic terms, an appropriate definition of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“an arrest constitutes a lawful execution of a legal duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Scott v. State“engaged in the lawful performance of duty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.