Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 F.2d 941 - Estate of Lutren v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad

Estate of Lutren v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad’s Empirical Analysis

592 F.2d 941 · 1979

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
December 1999
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1999

7 federal appellate ·

50197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cole v. United States · Fey v. Walston & Co. · Downie v. Powers · Bradshaw v. Thompson · Frederic P. Wiedersum Associates v. National Homes Construction Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as experience teaches, closing arguments occasionally raise matters which affect the content of the proposed instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A trial court's noncompliance with Rule 51 will not relieve an appellant of the obligation to object in every case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.