Gray v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis
592 F.3d 296 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · Rice v. Collins · 46 Cal. 4th 539 - People v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As other federal courts have noted in rejecting claims of discrimination against 'non-whites' in jury selection, it is open to serious question whether such a class of persons possesses the definable quality, common thread of attitudes or experiences, or community of interests essential to recognition as a 'group.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Morales“the state court's decision 'was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as established by the Supreme Court of the United States.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“what to make of a prosecutor's striking members of multiple minority groups depends on a number of case-specific factors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.