Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

592 Pa. 222

924 A.2d 612

Commonwealth v. Crawley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 2007

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2007-05-31

Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Commonwealth v. Miller

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-05-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Commonwealth v. Keaton (2012), Commonwealth v. Martin (2010)

2 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

330200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Justice EAKIN,

¶1concurring.

¶2I join the majority opinion. I write separately to reiterate my concerns expressed in Commonwealth v. Miller, 585 Pa. 144, 888 A.2d 624, 633 (2005) (Eakin, J., concurring) (stating “no legislation has been passed to [set mental retardation standards for capital defendants since Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), and] this is inherently a legislative matter — it is hoped that the legislature would also act without further delay.”). It has been almost five years since Atkinswas decided, and the legislature has still not acted in this regard. In the continued absence of legislative action, I agree with the three-part construct Justice Castille set forth in his concurring opinion. See Concurring Op., at 231-32, 924 A.2d at 617.

/592/pa/222 · .json · Public domain