Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

592 Pa. 8

922 A.2d 873

Nutter v. Dougherty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 2007

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2007-04-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2007

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“), which places limitations on political campaign contributions, is invalid under the Home Rule Act, 53 P.S. § 13133, because it is”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Nutter v. Dougherty

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-04-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issue:

Whether the Philadelphia Code Chapter 20-1000, et seq. (“Campaign Finance Law”), which places limitations on political campaign contributions, is invalid under the Home Rule Act, 53 P.S. § 13133, because it is “contrary to, or in limitation of’ the Pennsylvania Election Code where the Election Code already contains comprehensive provisions *9 regulating the permissible size, type and manner of political campaign contributions, but also allows unlimited contributions in most instances?
/592/pa/8 · .json · Public domain