Commonwealth v. Tejeda

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 2007

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2007-09-13

Relies on Commonwealth v. Liebel

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-09-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably McShea v. City of Philadelphia (2010), Gardner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (2008)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 AND NOW, this 13th day of September 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the PCRA court to consider whether petitioner is entitled to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal to this Court nunc pro tunc based upon trial counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to file a requested timely petition for allowance of appeal. See Commonwealth v. Liebel, 573 Pa. 375, 825 A.2d 630 (2003). Jurisdiction is relinquished.