Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

594 A.2d 1095

State v. Pelletier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 30, 1991

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 1991-07-30

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1995

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Mason

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-07-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CLIFFORD, Justice,

¶1with whom COLLINS and BRODY, JJ., join, dissenting.

¶2Because in my judgment the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial, I respectfully dissent.

¶3Mistrials should be granted only sparingly. State v. Mason, 528 A.2d 1259, 1260 (Me.1987).

The trial court should deny a motion for mistrial except in the rare case when the trial cannot proceed to a fair result and no remedy short of a new trial will satisfy the interests of justice.

¶4Id.The justice presiding at trial was in a unique position to assess what impact the handing of the bag by the prosecutor to defense counsel had upon the jury, and he concluded that the impact was insufficient to justify a mistrial. We should defer to that assessment. In my judgment, the refusal to grant a mistrial was well within the discretion of the trial justice.

¶5I would affirm the conviction.

/594/a2d/1095 · .json · Public domain