Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

598 Pa. 8

952 A.2d 1166

Commonwealth v. Patton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 2008

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2008-06-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2009

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-06-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

"Whether the per se rule of Dejesus applies in non-capital cases; if not, was the within request improper and prejudicial?
/598/pa/8 · .json · Public domain